|
|
|
|
In addition to the TSM stock
trades, most daily reports will contain a list of potential Naked Put Positions.
This list is chosen to meet return (>18 percent annualized) and
downside protection (from 5 to 15 percent depending on time to
expiration) criteria. Usually, from one to 10 opportunities
are presented from the 1,000s available for this group of TSM
stocks.
If you're interested in learning Day-Trading Methodology, particularly for TSM
stocks, the "Day-Trading Edge" provides statistical
edges that are constantly being developed. For example, over 52 trading
days between 11/05/07 and 1/18/08, 80 percent of the time AAPL made either its
high or low of the day in its first hour of trading. And over 80 percent of the
time AAPL traded at least $1 higher and $1 lower than its prior day's close.
Both provide trading edges important to the day trader, as I write this (04/11/08), TSM
has developed six such trading edges. Others are sure to come. So, how has the TSM
approach performed? Very well is the simple answer. Over a 27-quarter
period between 4th quarter 2003 and the end of second quarter of
2010, 2,658 half-position trades were forecast (mostly long but a few short and
inverse ETF plays): 1,839 winners and 819 losers for a 69.2
average percent win rate ( with about 101 half-position trades
executed each quarter) [last 13 quarters the win rate averaged 76.2 percent: 80.5, 78.0, 73.2, 73.1, 72.5,
74.1, 73.2, 61.7, 76.0, 82.6, 91.2, 73.5 and 81.4
percent, respectively, from 2nd Q '07 to 2nd Q '10--over some very difficult times] ;
25 of the 27 quarters produced
greater than 5 percent gains--18 greater than 10
percent; the 27 averaged 12.3 percent and ranged from -6.2 to +23.9) [find
a complete breakdown by quarters here] and only once
did the TSM approach actually lose money (-6.22 percent in 3rd Q or '03). The average
trade lasted 6.3 days (3.25 days in '08, 3.88 days in '09 and 9.2 days in '10), and a $35,000
account would have grown to $719,585 (1,956 percent return) while
the S&P gained 3.49 percent over the same period. See Results
for further
information. Finally,
take a look at the "Trader's Corner."
It offers a series of articles aimed at teaching the components of the TSM approach.
Is TSM the "golden goose" that will make you
millions? No. TSM is a sound approach to
picking quality stocks for longs and failing stocks for
shorts. Even so, it's stringent trade management
criteria (profit and stop-loss targets for 1/2 position
trades) result in profit only 69.2 percent of the time (76.2
percent on average over the past 13 difficult
quarters). Albeit, over 98 percent of the picks are
profitable during the trade's life but some 30.8 percent don't meet the TSM
profit target and get stopped out for a loss. The market's true
"golden goose" is sound trade management. Don't let
anyone ever tell you different.
The most foolish refrain heard concerning
stock investment: "It's a quality company, and its stock
price will recover. I'll just hold and wait this
temporary downturn out!"
Good luck and good trading,
Ric Miller,
Ph.D. and Master 6-Sigma Master Black Belt
Statistician Returns 2003 (4th quarter) through 2nd quarter 2010: With the close of 2010's 2nd quarter, let's summarize the 27 complete quarters in which long/short trades have been forecasted since 9/15/03. Results are in the accompanying Chart and Table. The TSM approach primarily buys undervalued, fundamentally sound stocks giving quality technical entry points: pullbacks and breakouts. Each entry is accompanied by profit and loss exit points: two for profit. See trade optimization details in the 8/29/05 report. The following chart tracks the account balance and percent drawdown over the 27 quarters.
Distribution of TSM Trade
Returns for 2006:
The chart below shows that 154 of the 175 stocks
traded in 2006 (88.0%) had gains from the buy or short price of at least $0.50, while 133 (76 percent) had gains of
$1.00 or more over
the life of trade.
Truthfully, the TSM approach is at its best in a bullish, trending market. It's based on a sound combination of technical and fundamental criteria that are hard to beat. A complete 27-quarter record is shown in the following table.
TripleScreenMethod (TSM) Methodology and Results for 2003 to 2010 | ||||||
|
|