In past issues of
CANSLIM.net News, I’ve written about three measures of the
state of the market: the yield curve (June 2005), the NYSE bullish
percent, a measure of the percentage of NYSE companies giving
bullish “point & figure” signals (May 2005), and the number of
stocks, with shares priced greater than $10 and trading at
least 100,000 shares daily, currently trading below their respective
200-day moving averages (May 2005). In this issue, I consider two
additional measures of market sentiment.
Traders
use measures of market sentiment to gauge imminent change in the
stock market. More often than not, these provide contrary signals.
A good example is the magazine cover where a story bullish enough to
make the cover of a major financial magazine frequently spells its
reversal. Fortune’s EBAY Oct. 18, 2004, cover
article is an example. Within a few weeks after publication, EBAY
topped.
The reason
sentiment indicators as a group act as contrary indicators is that
by the time they provide a bullish or bearish signal, like making
the cover with a bullish story, everyone that wants to own or get
rid of the stock already has. In the case of the bullish cover, the
major institutions already own the stock so there is little
additional buying pressure to overcome any selling. Before you know
it, selling pressure overwhelms, the stock falls, others join in
profit taking, and the stock falls further.
Two of the more
useful contrary sentiment indicators are the CBOE (Chicago Board
Options Exchange) equity put/call ratio and the OEX volatility
index, the latter taken from the implied volatility of the OEX
options. The first is a ratio of the volume of equity put options
traded at the CBOE on a given day divided by the volume of equity
call options traded. As the market sells off and fear sets in,
traders and institutions buy puts to hedge their positions. As a
result, the ratio climbs above 1. When the market climbs and greed
prevails, the reverse happens. They buy calls, and the ratio drops
below 1. Invariably, they’re wrong both times.
The second, the
OEX volatility index, works the same way. As the market falls,
volatility increases because option sellers demand higher premium to
provide the puts, and that’s reflected directly in increased option
volatility. And they’re usually wrong, too, for the same reasons
covers act as contrary indicators of fear and greed.
I’ve followed Jay
Kaeppel’s lead, as he discussed in the August 2004 issue of
Active Trader. He combined these two indicators in the average
of the ratio of their respective short-term (10 day) and long-term
(65 day) moving averages. Ratios normalize the two indicators and
allow their combination, but also, better reflect the change in
sentiment. An increase in the average reflects increased fear and,
as a contrarian indicator, signals an imminent market rebound.
Conversely, a decrease reflects increased greed and signals the
coming drop in the market.
Instead of the
simple average of these two normalized indicators, I use their
product to accentuate the state where the two agree with one
another. Does it work? You be the judge.
Chart I shows the
S&P 500 over the last few years as well as the sentiment product.
Notice how most of the sentiment peaks (labeled A through J) mark
minima in the S&P. Two thick diagonal lines provide examples of the
inverse relationship, i.e., where the sentiment product dropped
while the S&P rose.